[New Pub] Estimating LLM Grading Ability and Response Difficulty in Automatic Short Answer Grading via Item Response Theory

New Pub
On July 4, 2026, Longwei Cong virtually presented the paper “Estimating LLM Grading Ability and Response Difficulty in Automatic Short Answer Grading via Item Response Theory” at the ACL SIGEDU 21st Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2026). The work investigates automatic short answer grading with large language models from a psychometric perspective. Instead of relying only on aggregate evaluation metrics such as accuracy or macro-F1, the study applies Item Response Theory to jointly estimate the grading ability of individual LLMs and the difficulty of student responses. The results show that LLM graders differ not only in their overall performance, but also in their robustness when evaluating more difficult responses. In addition, highly difficult responses were found to induce systematic grading errors, including a tendency…
Read More

[New Pub] Confidence Estimation in Automatic Short Answer Grading with LLMs

New Pub
  On June 30, Longwei Cong presented the work “Confidence Estimation in Automatic Short Answer Grading with LLMs” at the 27th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2026) in Seoul. The work investigates how confidence estimates can make automatic short-answer grading with large language models more reliable in practice. In addition to commonly used model-based confidence signals, it also considers uncertainty originating from the data itself. In particular, aleatoric uncertainty is estimated from the semantic heterogeneity of student responses and combined with several model-side confidence signals. The study evaluates these uncertainty estimates with a focus on practical use: whether they can support selective grading and help identify responses for which automated grading is less reliable and human review would be preferable. The paper is available via the following…
Read More
New Pub: The Dependency Dilemma of Machine Learning Aids

New Pub: The Dependency Dilemma of Machine Learning Aids

Artificial Intelligence, Journal, New Pub
AI and machine-learning decision aids can be a great support for employees and help them improve their work performance. An overreliance on algorithmic recommendations, on the other hand, may result in a long-term reduction of the employees’ ability to develop and maintain their own decision-making skills. This could be especially problematic when such AI and machine-learning decision aids are not available. Instead of overly relying on such AI-based recommendations, organizations should train their employees to continue developing their critical thinking and decision-making skills. Hendrik Drachsler and his research partners address this problematic dependency on AI tools and the conflict of interests in the workplace in their newly published article “The Dependency Dilemma: How Machine Learning Decision Aids can Undermine Skill Growth”. Using a controlled experiment, the authors found that participants…
Read More

[New Pub] Report on the BEA 2026 Shared Task on Rubric-based Short Answer Scoring for German

New Pub
At BEA 2026, we organized the first shared task on rubric-based short answer scoring for German, introducing a new benchmark dataset spanning multiple STEM domains and designed to evaluate both in-domain performance and generalization to previously unseen questions. The goal was to better understand how modern NLP systems can interpret and apply textual scoring rubrics—an ability that closely mirrors how human assessors evaluate student responses. The shared task attracted multiple teams, who explored a wide range of approaches, including fine-tuned large language models, retrieval-augmented prompting, hybrid symbolic–neural systems, and ensemble methods. Across all four evaluation tracks, systems that explicitly incorporated rubric semantics consistently achieved the strongest performance, while scoring previously unseen questions remained the biggest challenge. We hope this benchmark provides a foundation for future research on more robust, interpretable,…
Read More

[New Pub] Rubrics as Semantic Subspaces: A New Perspective on AI Assessment

New Pub
How can AI not only score student answers accurately, but also explain why it assigned a particular score? In our latest paper, we introduce AGRAA (Aspect-Grounded Rubric–Answer Alignment), a new framework for rubric-based assessment that represents rubric criteria as semantic subspaces. Instead of treating scoring as a standard classification problem, AGRAA measures how strongly a student's response aligns with the latent semantic aspects defined by each rubric level. We evaluate the approach on both short-answer and essay scoring benchmarks, where it consistently achieves performance highly competitive with strong transformer-based baselines. More importantly, the model naturally produces interpretable explanations by showing which rubric-defined aspects contributed to each scoring decision. We believe this work is a step toward automated assessment systems that are not only accurate, but also transparent, trustworthy, and aligned…
Read More
New Pub: Competent Usage of AI and Digital Technology in Education

New Pub: Competent Usage of AI and Digital Technology in Education

Artificial Intelligence, New Pub, Publication
[caption id="attachment_8403" align="alignright" width="300"] Modified TPACK model as Level 2 of the AIEDTEC-CDM. Note. TPK = technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK), TCK = technological content knowledge, PCK = pedagogical content knowledge, TPCK = technological pedagogical content knowledge.[/caption] How can teachers and learners use AI and digital technology competently, critically and safely in education? Simply using AI tools and digital technology in educational settings does not necessarily mean that learners will profit from these tools. Some tools may have a positive effect on learning, while others may not. A newly published paper addresses this issue and formulates a theoretical framework for the “Competence to Use Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technology in Educational Processes” (AIEDTEC competence). Combining insights from psychology and computer science, it aims to provide a theoretical definition of the competent…
Read More
[New Pub] Analyzing students’ conceptual understanding over the course of a teaching unit: Tracking changes in knowledge structures over time

[New Pub] Analyzing students’ conceptual understanding over the course of a teaching unit: Tracking changes in knowledge structures over time

New Pub
In a recent study, we explored how students’ conceptual understanding develops throughout a digitally supported chemistry unit on chemical kinetics. Working with approximately 300 upper-secondary students, we combined automated scoring of students’ written responses and other learning artifacts with network analysis techniques to model the growth of individual knowledge structures over time. The results showed that transformer-based language models can reliably identify and score chemistry-related knowledge elements from classroom data, enabling the construction of longitudinal knowledge networks that reflect how students connect scientific concepts. Several network characteristics were associated with students’ posttest performance, suggesting that these representations capture meaningful aspects of learning progress. The findings highlight the potential of combining automated assessment and learning analytics to provide teachers with real-time insights into students’ developing understanding and to support adaptive instructional…
Read More
Workshop on Educational NLP at the 20th EATEL Summer School

Workshop on Educational NLP at the 20th EATEL Summer School

New Pub
At this year's JTEL Summer school, Sebastian Gombert and Amir Rajabi from DIPF hosted a workshop on Natural Language Processing (NLP) for Education and Research. Participants explored how modern language technologies can support both educational practice and scientific inquiry. The session introduced core NLP concepts and discussed applications ranging from automated assessment and feedback generation to classroom discourse analysis, literature synthesis, and retrieval-augmented generation. Following the introductory presentation, participants worked collaboratively in small groups to design NLP-based solutions for real-world challenges. Drawing on both provided examples and their own research interests, attendees developed concepts for systems such as educational recommender tools, feedback assistants, and research support applications. Interactive collaboration was supported through discussion, sketching, and digital whiteboarding. The workshop highlighted not only the growing potential of large language models and…
Read More
[New Pub] Automatic Short Answer Grading with LLMs: From Memorization to Reasoning

[New Pub] Automatic Short Answer Grading with LLMs: From Memorization to Reasoning

New Pub
On 01. Mai, Longwei Cong presented his paper “Automatic Short Answer Grading with LLMs: From Memorization to Reasoning” at the 16th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. The paper examines the performance of fine-tuned PLMs and LLMs across different dataset sizes and compares them with prompt-based approaches for automatic short answer grading. The results show that fine-tuned LLMs and rubric-based prompting can match or even exceed the performance of BERT-based models. In particular, rubric-based prompting with open-weight models can deliver competitive results without requiring annotated training data or hardware-intensive fine-tuning, while also helping to address data protection concerns. This work provides empirical evidence for the role of LLMs in automatic short answer grading and opens up future research directions on resource-efficient, interpretable, and reasoning-driven grading. You can find the…
Read More
[New Pub] Are rubrics all you need? Towards rubric-based automatic short answer scoring via guided rubric-answer alignment

[New Pub] Are rubrics all you need? Towards rubric-based automatic short answer scoring via guided rubric-answer alignment

New Pub
Rubrics are everywhere in education — but surprisingly, most AI systems for grading short answers barely use them. In our recent paper, Are Rubrics All You Need?, presented by Sebastian Gombert at the LAK 2026, we introduce rubric-based automatic short-answer scoring, a new approach where AI models explicitly align student answers with rubric criteria instead of treating grading as a black-box classification problem. We propose two novel architectures, GRAASP and ToLeGRAA, which use transformer-based alignment mechanisms to compare learner responses directly against rubric descriptions. Across German and English benchmark datasets, the models achieved highly competitive performance and transferred better to unseen questions than traditional instance-based classifiers. Particularly exciting is ToLeGRAA’s ability to generate token-level alignment maps, making it possible to visualize which parts of a student answer correspond to specific…
Read More